ON PAPER.
THE RELIABLE NARRATOR — PART I
My sister gave me this journal for our birthday.
It's small and hardcover, light pink with a mint green ribbon for a bookmark. The entire cover is a flowering vine — periwinkle blooms, indigo stems — weaving across every inch of space. In the center, in tiny letters: words of affirmation. She didn't know when she ordered it whether it would arrive in time. It did.
She had written the first entry herself. Twenty-eight things she loved about me — one for each year — in her handwriting, on the first page. I read it and sobbed. Of course I did. She had been listening to me feel hopeless about love for weeks, really listening, and this was her answer: not advice, not a framework, just twenty-eight quiet, specific reasons I was already enough.
A few weeks later, he left.
I picked up the journal then — past my sister's entry, into the blank pages that followed it — and I started writing. Not a list yet. Just the raw, unedited wreckage of those first days. The processing, the grief, the trying to understand what had happened and why. My handwriting getting messier as I went, my thoughts moving faster than my hand could keep up. I stopped caring how it looked.
And then, in January, a month into the new year and a month out from the ending, I turned to a fresh page and wrote something different.
Not grief. A list.
Requirements. Things I would look for next time. Things that if present would mean I was safe. Most of it, I would understand only later, was a direct translation of everything he hadn't been. I revised it again in April. Refined it. As if I could get it right if I just kept working on it.
I didn't notice the irony then. That I was building a system inside a gift that had been trying to tell me I didn't need one.
The list had six items the first time. It grew.
Someone who is certain about me. That one came first, and it stayed at the top through every revision. A few months before he and I started dating, he had cancelled a date we had planned — said he didn't feel a connection. I was disappointed and I accepted it. Then on Christmas Day he reached out through the contact form on my website. Like a formal request for re-entry. He said he'd ended things prematurely. I gave him another chance.
He left anyway. Less than a year later, for the second time, he showed me he wasn't sure.
So I wrote it down. Someone who is certain about me. As if writing it would protect me. As if the next person would read the list before they met me and agree to its terms.
The other items followed the same logic. Someone who takes things slow — because the first time I'd been rushed somewhere I wasn't ready to go and paid a price I didn't expect. Someone who maintains a fulfilling individual life and also puts in effort to nourish what we're building together — because I had learned what it felt like to be someone's entire world and then watch that weight become resentment. Someone emotionally mature, self-aware, doing the work — because I had danced with someone who performed depth without having it, who walked me in circles around a room that was pretending to be a museum.
Each item a lesson. Each lesson a scar.
I didn't see it that way then. I thought I was being smart. Discerning. I had been hurt enough times to know what I didn't want, and I was simply naming it. Wasn't that what you were supposed to do? The internet had a whole vocabulary for it by then — green flags, secure attachment, emotional availability. There were entire accounts dedicated to helping women identify what healthy love looked like. I absorbed it all. I took notes. I updated my list.
What nobody told me — what I couldn't have heard even if someone had tried — was that I was asking the wrong question.
The checklist wasn't a vision for the future. It was a museum of everywhere I'd already been hurt. Every item a door I was trying to keep locked. Every requirement a place on my body that still ached when I pressed it.
It was trying to solve for safety through legibility. If I can name what I'm looking for, I can find it. If I can find it, I'll be protected.
But heartbreak doesn't care about your criteria. And the body was never confused about any of it.
I wasn't building this list in isolation.
There were podcasts — whole episodes dedicated to dating and relationships, to identifying what you deserve, to recognizing the difference between the right person and the familiar person. There were books about healing, about attachment, about becoming the kind of woman who attracts the kind of love she's looking for. There were conversations with friends, long ones, the kind that stretch past midnight and leave you feeling briefly certain about everything. We all believed in this vocabulary. It made sense to us. It felt like finally having the right tools after years of building things with our hands.
Green flags. Secure attachment. Emotional availability. Consistency. We said these words to each other like they were a diagnosis and a cure at the same time.
And I want to be fair to all of it — because it wasn't useless. Some of it genuinely helped. It gave me language for things I hadn't been able to name. It helped me understand patterns I had been living inside without seeing.
But here is what none of it ever quite said:
Your body already knows.
Not your analysis. Not your checklist. Not the framework you assembled from podcasts and paperbacks and late night conversations with your most well-meaning friends. Your body — the stomach that turns, the shoulders that draw inward, the heat that rises in your face before you've even finished processing what just happened.
The books taught me to look outward for evidence. To audit. To evaluate. To run the list against a person and see what came back. What they didn't teach me — what I'm not sure any of them knew how to teach — was how to listen to what was already happening inside me. How to trust the language my body had been speaking long before I had words for any of it.
I had outsourced the most important question to a system built by other people.
Is this a healthy love? I kept asking the checklist.
And the checklist kept answering. And my body kept saying something else.
Why the fuck didn't it work?
Because a checklist can tell you what someone looks like on paper. It cannot tell you what it feels like to be in the room with them. It cannot measure the low hum of discomfort you can't locate. It cannot account for the evening that curdled, the stone you swallowed at dinner, the bracing that became so habitual you stopped noticing it had become your resting state.
That's not data the list knows how to hold.
The journal is still with me.
I brought it across the world when I moved — from one life into another, from a city that held all of those encounters into a country I was learning to call home. It sits near me as I write this. Light pink cover, periwinkle flowers, indigo vines. Words of affirmation in tiny letters at the center.
I picked it up recently and read through it from the beginning.
My sister's entry is still on the first page. Twenty-eight things she loves about me, in her handwriting, steady and sure. I read it again and felt the same thing I felt the first time — that particular kind of being seen that only someone who has known you your whole life can offer. No criteria. No requirements. Just: here is who you are, and here is why that is enough.
A few pages later, in my own handwriting — neat at first, then urgent, then messy — the list.
I read it differently now. I can see what each item was protecting. I can trace every requirement back to the specific place it came from, the specific moment my body said not this and I didn't listen and paid for it afterward. The list wasn't wrong about what it wanted. It was just looking for those things in the wrong place — outside, in someone else's behavior, in evidence I could point to and say: see, it's safe, the checklist says so.
What it couldn't account for was the room. The actual felt experience of being in someone's presence. The stomach that settles or turns. The shoulders that drop or draw inward. The chest that opens or quietly closes. The body taking notes long before the mind has formed an opinion.
I spent years trying to learn a language someone else built to describe love. What I'm doing now — slowly, imperfectly, one essay at a time — is learning to read the one my body has been writing all along.
It was never broken. It was never wrong. It was just waiting for me to stop looking elsewhere for an answer it had already given me.
The checklist had six items. My body had one:
Pay attention.
The Reliable Narrator is a trilogy. Continue with Improvise and Dissenting (Coming soon).